POTUS Policy Memo Project
Word Count: 649
Title: The US Government violating the Material Support Statute.
To: Barack Obama, President of the United States
From: College student
Date: November doze, 2013
Subject: The government violating the united states Material Support Statute.
Seeing that, September you, 2011, america has gone to extreme actions to not only fight terrorism but prevent it also. Under federal law, nowadays there are criminal and civil charges for anyone offering " material supportвЂќ into a foreign terrorist organization (FTO). In Holder vs . Humanitarian Law Task, the Great Court acknowledged a very wide-ranging definition of what constitutes " material support. вЂќ The Court essentially held that a person is guilty of providing " material supportвЂќ if the aid provided to the organization might somehow get into the hands of an FTO. This turns into an issue pertaining to the United States govt when we all of the to the Free of charge Syrian Military (FSA), as we tend to ignore these rebels are struggling alongside terrorist organizations. Specifically, we have no way of knowing if the cash given to the FSA may well somehow enter the hands of an FTO. The United States at this time can avoid prosecution in such material support situations unless it explicitly waives its full sovereign coin immunity. The United States should do so in order to send a better message for the world that we are actually aiming to prevent terrorism from happening instead of helping it.
In 1996 the united states Congress came up with the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Fatality Penalty Act (AEDPA), following the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing (Sutherland 237). In section 2339B of AEDPA, the definition of " materials supportвЂќ can be mentioned and created (Sutherland 237). When ever Congress handed the USA Patriot Act of 2001 plus the Intelligence Change and Terrorism Prevent Take action of 2005, both functions successfully broadened the definition of " material supportвЂќ (Sutherland 237-238). Underneath the...
Cited: Cole, David. " The First Amendment's Boundaries: The Place of Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project in First Amendment Doctrine. вЂќ Harvard Regulation and Coverage Review six (2012): 147-177. Academic Search Complete. World wide web. 4 November 2013.
Dorrell, Oren. " Deal performed for the U. H. to send arms to Syria rebels. вЂќ USA Today. twenty three Jul 2013. Web. some Nov 13.
LaFranchi, Howard. " Immediate aid to Syria's rebels: Why right now вЂ“ and it is too late? вЂќ Christian Science Monitor (2013). Academic Search Finish. Web. four Nov 2013.
McKee, Erin. " Caught are the Peacemakers: The Impact of Holder sixth is v. Humanitarian Law Project on Resolve conflicts Activists. вЂќ Unrest Journal, Engaging Devices of Assault. 15 Jan 2011. Web. 6 Nov 2013
Cost, Michael, Robert Rubenstein and David H. Price. " Material Support: US anti-terrorism law threatens human rights and academic freedom. вЂќ Anthropology Today twenty-eight (2012): 3-5. Academic Search Complete. Internet. 5 November 2013.
Sutherland, Emma. " The Material Support Statute: Strangling Free Speech Locally? вЂќ George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal twenty-three (2013): 229-254. Academic Search Complete. Web five Nov 2013.
Totten, Jordan. " Syria's Endgame. вЂќ World Affairs 176 (2013): 28-34. Academic Search Complete. World wide web. 4 November 2013.